Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Good All In One Lens Best Canon Lens For Travel? I'm Looking For A Walkaround "all-in-one" Lens With A Good Zoom?

Best Canon lens for travel? I'm looking for a walkaround "all-in-one" lens with a good zoom? - good all in one lens

I have a Canon EOS 5D Mark II and I need a good goal for the trip. I can not have four or five glasses everywhere I go, especially during the holidays, I would like to purchase a lens with good zoom, auto focus and USM. I'm getting to 2.8, but f / 4 is also acceptable.

Oh ... and I would therefore not too expensive. In probably less than $ 1000 (hopefully under $ 1,000, but I know it is not likely)

5 comments:

Shorty said...

The Canon 70-200mm f / 4 is a great actor, much better than the budget telephoto zoom. However, unless you plan to do sports and wildlife shots, you must have at least another goal. The Canon 24-70 mm f/2.8 works well, even if, as, I said what the person is a little outside your budget.

The Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 works similarly to a lower price: http://www.adorama.com/SG247028HEOS.html ...

If you have all the goals that will cover almost the entire lenth of the coordination necessary to consider the Tamron 28-200mm. http://www.adorama.com/TM28200DEOS.html? ...

If you are willing to forego for a fast zoom lens, consider the Canon 50mm f/1.4: http://www.adorama.com/CA5014AFU.html?se ...

Shorty said...

The Canon 70-200mm f / 4 is a great actor, much better than the budget telephoto zoom. However, unless you plan to do sports and wildlife shots, you must have at least another goal. The Canon 24-70 mm f/2.8 works well, even if, as, I said what the person is a little outside your budget.

The Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 works similarly to a lower price: http://www.adorama.com/SG247028HEOS.html ...

If you have all the goals that will cover almost the entire lenth of the coordination necessary to consider the Tamron 28-200mm. http://www.adorama.com/TM28200DEOS.html? ...

If you are willing to forego for a fast zoom lens, consider the Canon 50mm f/1.4: http://www.adorama.com/CA5014AFU.html?se ...

Kite said...

Of course, if you provide a 5D, it can not afford a good magnifying glass!

Yes, that's pretty good.

I propose another: Tamron AF 28-300mm. It is incredibly cheap in the U.S., about $ 600. Here in Australia is more than a thousand.

http://www.amazon.com/Tamron-28-300mm-Vi ...

Supplied with Vibration Compensation ... Image stabilizer, in other words ...

The macro is not really a macro ... It is 1:2, not 1:1.

However, it is bad, I have some positive comments.

If you really want, there is a 100-400mm.

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-100-400mm-f4 ...

But unfortunately, it is 1500 U.S. $.

Tamron is cheap and good, it's a 18-270mm too.

So you have a wide range of choice ... Choose well!

NikonGuy said...

70-200mm should try my answer .... http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index ...

David M said...

The 70-200 F4L is a lens of regret that not better than a walk around the lens can. This is a telephoto lens, so you lose at the end of the normal angle. For a while on a journey through the lens are few good options. Some within your budget is not certain.

The goal 24-70 f/2.8 L is a wonderful sight quickly. The cost is about $ 1100 is just over your budget.

F4L The 24-105mm kit included in the 5D is a great lens. The costs amount to your budget.

The 28-135mm IS lens that comes with the 50D is a Lens quality is well within its budget of about $ 400. This is a F3.5-5.6, however.

The 28-200mm F3.5-5.6 is a decent goal and includes a good selection.

I must say that if you can not afford to high-quality lenses that would have been nice to buy the buy 50D over the 5D MKII.

Post a Comment